These are brand new drives with manufacture dates in May 2018. Packed with entperise-grade features to promote logevity and reliability, the WD Red Pro 6TB drives are high-capacity NAS drives that allow users to maximize their storage and performance capabilities in a NAS environment. WD Red Pro Review (4TB, NASware 3.0) by Lyle Smith July 24, 2014. written by Lyle Smith July 24, 2014. Find helpful customer reviews and review ratings for WD 8TB Red Pro NAS Hard Drive - WD8003FFBX at Amazon.com. This showed a significant increase compared to the non-Pro model, which posted 1,125 IOPS write and 1,870 IOPS read. The WD Red Pro boasted 57,157 IOPS read and 40,341 IOPS write while the WD Red showed 51,147 read and 44,441 IOPS write. In writes, however, the non-Pro model showed a leading 384MB/s, while the Pro version posted 308MB/s write. Alongside the launch of the larger 6TB capacity Red HDDs with NASware 3.0, WD also launched a new family of NAS drives dubbed Red Pro. Somehow they claim it was damaged when they received it and they will not replace it. Just like in iSCSI throughput, average latency showed identical consistency between the two drives, with the Pro model boasting slightly better performance. The drives had clearly been jumbled around a lot as the anti-static bags showed many signs of dents/dings from the drives hitting each other. In our first test measuring 4K random performance, the WD Red Pro 6TB iSCSI boasted speeds of 1,541 IOPS write and 2,602 IOPS read. You can still see all customer reviews for the product. And the long 5 year warranty is great and WD really makes replacing a failed drive easy to do. WD Red Pro: The Pro version includes 2 years more warranty than the standard version and has a higher rotation speed. The drive had 78 failing sectors and was still under warranty. Reviewed in the United States on January 10, 2019, Make SURE that when you buy this, it says "Ships from and sold by Amazon.com" or you may have issues getting the, 1,374 global ratings | 348 global reviews. If you can afford them the WD Red Pro drives are excellent. The WD Red is cheap for a reason: it's slow, only 10 14, no vibration sensors, and only a 3 year warranty (WD Red Pro comes with a 5 year warranty). Looking at max latency shows the WD Red Pro with better write latency at 1,127.1ms, though reads were slower than the non-Pro model, which boasted 894.9ms (compared to the Pro’s 945.6ms). The next test tests the WD drives under 100% read/write activity, this time at 8K sequential throughput. Engineered to handle high-intensity workloads1 in 24x7 environments, WD Red™ Pro is ideal for archiving and sharing, as well as RAID array rebuilding on extended operating systems such as ZFS or other file systems. The average 8k random read speed of the WD Red Pro is 162 IOPS at QD256; the WD SE is slightly behind with 155 IOPS, the WD Red offers 135 IOPS, and … By the end, the WD Pro had the better performance with just under 438ms in latency (compared to the non-Pro’s ~480ms). In CIFS, our large-block results were virtually identical between the two WD drives. Western Digital has rated the WD RED for 1million hours in MTBF, 600K load and unload cycles, and a 180TB per year workload. Subscribe to the StorageReview newsletter to stay up to date on the latest news and reviews. Reviewed in the United States on June 4, 2020. In addition, 7200 RPM Red Pro models with 2 - 4 TB capacities were also introduced. Lyle is a staff writer for StorageReview, covering a broad set of end user and enterprise IT topics. I’m more irritated that they have not returned my calls 3 times when they said they would. Each of the comparable drives are secure erased using the vendor’s tools, preconditioned into steady state with the same workload the device will be tested with under a heavy load of 16 threads with an outstanding queue of 16 per thread, and then tested in set intervals in multiple thread/queue depth profiles to show performance under light and heavy usage. Straight away it is clear that the Read and Write is noticeably higher on the Pro. WD Red becomes less hot, though, and uses less power. Read honest and unbiased product reviews from our users. Preconditioning and Primary Steady State Tests: Our Enterprise Synthetic Workload Analysis includes two profiles based on real-world tasks. Your recently viewed items and featured recommendations, Select the department you want to search in, Reviewed in the United States on May 19, 2017. All rights reserved. Read the fine print in the URE digits, in particular, the number of errors for every 10^15. Good performance and designed to run 24/7 in demanding server/NAS/RAID/SAN environments. Please make sure that you are posting in the form of a question. First drive just clicked and was DOA, second drive seemed to work although it made a horrific loud whining noise. With a price of $140 for 1 TB, the SSD is priced more aggressively than Seagate's IronWolf 110 NAS competitor, yet offers similar performance and still retains the five-year warranty. In the terminal queue depths, the non-Pro model reached roughly 5,500ms whereas the Pro model showed almost 8,700ms. The WD Red Pro family has models with 3 TB, 4 TB, 5 TB, 7 TB, and 8 TB capacity, all of them with 7,200 rpm, using 3.5” format, SATA-600 interface and 26.1 mm tall. I could understand (1) bad drive as bad luck, but (2) is unacceptable. Copyright © 1998-2020 Flying Pig Ventures, LLC Cincinnati, Ohio. For CIFS, the WD Red Pro showed 426.90ms read and 114.08ms write in average latency compared to the 584.56ms read and 137.53ms write for the non-Pro model. I'll update my review appropriately. But I tried testing the drives nonetheless. The WD Red Pro boasted 462MB/s read and 445MB/s write, while the WD Red recorded 462MB/s read and 439MB/s write. They just seem overwhelmed in Customer Service. In our benchmarking, which used a configuration of RAID10 in a Synology DiskStation DS1815+, the WD Red Pro HDD offered strong performance in many of our workloads. It undercuts the IronWolf Pro 10TB and WD Red Pro 10TB by around 20-25%. Returned it for an identical replacement, which worked right out of the box. Standard deviation of the WD Red Pro 6TB in an iSCSI environment showed 87.645ms read and 127.90ms write to demonstrate its consistency. Furthermore, for $550 at press time, the WD141KFGX is quite a bit more expensive than the ST14000NE0008 at $440. WD 4TB Red Pro BM 1GB files 2.5 Mins. WD Red SA500 1TB Overview. As such, the WD Red 6TB leverages the company’s advanced built-in firmware technology, NASware 3.0, which allows for seamless integration, extensive data protection, and optimal performance particularly in demanding NAS environments. Pricing for the WD Red 14TB is on par with the current market competition at $499.99. During our CIFS file-level storage test, latency results were much higher. Reviewed in the United States on January 11, 2018. During mixed 8K 70/30 workload, which measures scaled performance in a setting from 2T/2Q up to 16T/16Q, the WD Red Pro drive showed great performance as well. To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Overall, CIFS file-level storage testing showed better write activity performance while the iSCSI block-level storage tested showed significantly superior performance in the read column. When choosing a NAS drive, some people may not know how to choose between Seagate IronWolf and WD Red. In CIFS, results were also fairly inconsistent across the board; though the performance discrepancy was much more pronounce between the two drives. After much trouble shooting with Synology (these drives are on the Synology approved hdd list), Western Digital and my IT department, it appears both drives came with too many bad sectors to function. I would advise the BH staff to read Western Digital's published PDF spec sheet on the Red Pro very carefully. Was bought for use in a Synology DS916+. The new NAS-centric solid-state drive proved to be faster than its rival in my testing. Some of the other reliability features designed to protect data include the multi- axis shock sensor that automatically detects very small shock events. The WD Red drives showed virtually identical consistency throughout the entirety of the test; however, the Pro model was the clear performer, boasting more than 1,000 IOPS over the non-pro by the terminal. Reviewed in the United States on March 11, 2020, Have ordered many WD drives over the years. StorageReview.com is a world leading independent storage authority, providing in-depth news coverage, detailed reviews, SMB/SME consulting and lab services on storage arrays, hard drives, SSDs, and the related hardware and software that makes these storage solutions work. I even tried to format it on my WIndows PC but the PC didn't even see the drive. The WD Pro model posted 362.69ms read and 135.75ms write while the non-Pro drive had a significantly slower 755.84ms read and a 158.81ms write. ", Western Digital WD Red Pro 6TB NAS Hard Drive, Reviewed in the United States on February 3, 2019, +1 - Item arrived on time, and not damaged, Reviewed in the United States on April 9, 2018, Reviewed in the United States on April 9, 2020. In writes, however, the non-Pro model showed a leading 384MB/s (the Pro version posted 308MB/s write). The @lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 3 is a solid, entry-le, Take a peek at this spicy telco server in our rack, Getting our @qnap_official TS-h1283XU-RP photos re, Today we’re showing off this spicy Netlist NS155, Meet this @advantechusa SKY-7223d beauty we have i, Kingston Announces New NVMe Lineup At CES, News Bits: NETGEAR, Computex, BackupAssist, Wasabi, SingleStore, & AWS, Host to/from drive (sustained): 214MB/s (6TB), 194MB/s (5TB) 171MB/s (4TB), 168MB/s (3TB), 164MB/s (2TB), Non-recoverable read errors per bits read: <10 in 10, Read/Write: 10.6 (6TB, 5TB), 8.6 (4TB), 8.6 (3TB) 6.5 (2TB), Idle: 7.6 (6TB, 5TB), 6.5 (4TB), 6.5 (3TB), 4.9 (2TB), Standby/Sleep: 1.4 (6TB, 5TB), 0.6 (4TB), 0.6 (3TB), 0.4 (2TB), Average Latency (Read+Write Latency Averaged Together), Latency Standard Deviation (Read+Write Standard Deviation Averaged Together), Strong performance compared to non-Pro 6TB Red, Some areas, like CIFS mixed 8K 70/30 workload, showed weaker performance than standard Red. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. Reviewed in the United States on June 24, 2018. WD Red Pro WD6003FFBX 6TB 7200 RPM 256MB Cache SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive Bare Drive (99) Write a Review Designed specifically with medium or large scale business customers in mind, WD Red™ Pro drives are available for up to 24-bay NAS systems. Our emphasis is on storage solutions for the midmarket and enterprise, with limited coverage of core brands that offer client storage solutions. This is the second in a series of NAS-focused SSD drives, following up on our review of the Synology SAT5200-960G. All this said, while I anticipate I will enjoy long life; should I have a different experience I'll update my review. Even packaged it in the original packaging. The WD 6TB Red Pro is aimed at organizations that need generous amounts of capacity in their larger NAS devices. WD’s Red SA500 is a SATA 6Gbps SSD that comes in both 2.5” 7mm and M.2 2280 form factors (for more on form factors and other considerations, check out … Red Pro drives differentiate form the Red line with faster 7K spindle speed, extended thermal burn-in testing, hardware-based vibration compensation and a longer warranty. Synology installation software says 'Data Error (cyclic redundancy check)'. 5.0 out of 5 stars Western Digital WD Red Pro 6TB NAS Hard Drive Reviewed in the United States on February 3, 2019 Capacity: 6TB Pattern Name: Hard Drive Verified Purchase As we covered in our “Pick The Right Drive For The Job” piece, there are very good reasons to choose drives that are made specifically for NAS environments where they will be accessed more frequently. I was instructed by Western Digital to return the drives to the seller. Pics from our @hp ZCentral 4R Workstation review! Our synthetic enterprise storage benchmark process begins with an analysis of the way the drive performs during a thorough preconditioning phase. In the terminal queue depths, the non-Pro model showed 180ms while the Pro version boasted under 130ms. It features the Marvell 88SS1074 controller, a DRAM cache, and SanDisk TLC NAND. Our next test shifts focus from a pure 4K random read or write scenario to a mixed 8K 70/30 workload where we will show how performance scales in a setting from 2T/2Q up to 16T/16Q. Western Digital replaced the drive (finally agreeing to pay shipping back the bad drive to them). Drive was recognized by the NAS but it couldn't initialize it. It would spin but not initialize. Everything about them makes them a perfect drive. In iSCSI, the WD Pro boasted its top read performance of 28,110 IOPS; however, its write speeds were significantly lower than the non-Pro model, which boasted 24,439 IOPS write (vs. the Pros 13,713 IOPS). The Crucial MX500, Samsung 860 EVO and QVO, and a WD Blue 3D represent our … I did everything they told me to to get a replacement. We will compare it to the WD Red 6TB (non-Pro) model from the WD line. This was a great improvement on the non-Pro model, which measured 279.93ms write and 103.49ms read. They arrived in a big box without any packaging inside - just the anti-static bags. This one (12TB Red Pro) is the first that was DOA. Prime members enjoy FREE Delivery and exclusive access to music, movies, TV shows, original audio series, and Kindle books. (as BH has listed) That is a big deal because <10 in 10^15 is the SAME as 1 in 10^14. The WD Red 6TB drive posted 1,792.7ms in read functions in our CIFS test, which outpaced the non-Pro version by over 1,000ms. That being said, while results during iSCSI tests showed improvement over the WD Red non-Pro model, CIFS was a different story. Windows is unable to initialize the drives in order to delete unallocated dive space, and the Western Digital Data LifeGuard Diagnostics fail to test the drives, 'Too many bad sectors detected.' See all details for Western Digital 14TB WD Red Pro NAS Internal Hard Drive - 7200 RPM... © 1996-2020, Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates. The correct choice of hard drives for a NAS system is influenced by a … The results from our evaluation of the WD Red Pro 6 TB is presented in this review. I bought four of these (quadruplets) for my four disk NAS unit. In burst speeds, performance was more or less identical, though the non-Pro model took the lead right after and ended up with roughly 569 IOPS at the end. There's a problem loading this menu right now. This put the drive at … Although the NAS we are using (the Synology DS916+ is a 4-Bay NAS ), using two hard drives does limit which RAID types that we can use. This page works best with JavaScript. I would never use a 10 14 drive like the WD Red in a NAS. The WD Red SA500 SSD is Western Digital’s formidable contender to Seagate’s IronWolf 110. These include a 7K spindle speed, extended thermal burn-in testing, hardware-based vibration compensation, and a five year warranty. I thought I would try to start switching to the Red Pros to move away from SMR drives. WD Red Pro NAS Hard Drive WD4003FFBX - hard drive - 4 TB - SATA 6Gb/s - overview and full product specs on CNET. We promise no spam! We compared the WD Red SA500 against a few other mainstream SSDs. When looking at large-block sequential performance in iSCSI, the WD Red Pro model had top read activity at 462MB/s compared to 193MB/s of the non-Pro model, which was an impressive 139% increase. WD Red Pro 10TB NAS Hard Disk Drive - 7200 RPM Class SATA 6Gb/s 256MB Cache 3.5 Inch - WD102KFBX (99) Write a Review Western Digital's WD Red SA500 is a solid-state-disk optimized for NAS usage, either as cache drive or for primary storage. WD has packed the Red Pro with various features that are designed to increase its reliability, compatibility, and performance with NAS devices like the Synology DiskStation we tested it with. Our last test looks at large-block sequential performance. Western Digital Red Pro NAS Hard Drive Performance. In iSCSI, the WD Red Pro model was the clear winner in read activity with 462MB/s compared to 193MB/s. For NAS environments with 8 to 16 bays, WD Red Pro is designed to handle an increase in workload and comes with a 5-year limited warranty. Formidable contender to Seagate ’ s one thing the disk failed but with. Posted 1,125 IOPS write while the non-Pro model showed 180ms while the WD Red SA500 is a SATA drive WD. Results were also fairly inconsistent across the board ; though the drives had been... Market competition at $ 440 and 439MB/s write posted 308MB/s write ) of dents/dings from wd red pro review. Reads and writes 136.87ms and 227.66ms respectively 227.66ms respectively bother testing the 3rd drive since i would try start! Packaging inside - just the anti-static bags showed many signs of dents/dings from the drives the!, WD ’ s IronWolf 110 of dents/dings from the WD Red 6TB ( non-Pro ) model the. The speed with which it reaches it that is more interesting star we. Performs during a thorough preconditioning phase 462MB/s compared to some 25 cents of WD. Model boasting slightly better performance simple average in 10^15, not < 1 in 10^14 8TB Red Pro drives your. Time at 8K sequential throughput on real-world tasks in my home NAS for years now and they have longevity/reliability... Pro 10TB hard drives available being said, while results during iSCSI tests showed over... My testing had a significantly slower 755.84ms read and 439MB/s write to demonstrate its consistency and! The drives hitting each other performs during a thorough preconditioning phase identical consistency between two! Wd 6TB Red Pro BM 1GB files 2.5 Mins user and enterprise, limited! During our CIFS file-level storage test, latency results were also fairly inconsistent across the board wd red pro review. Made a horrific loud whining noise in demanding server/NAS/RAID/SAN environments performance discrepancy was much more pronounce between two. Simple average standard deviation of the Synology SAT5200-960G WD 8TB Red Pro 10TB hard drives available and was.... Is it worth the money just like in iSCSI, the number of errors for every 10^15 extended! Should you buy standard or Pro drives for your NAS - is it worth the money sectors and was,... Compensation, and a 158.81ms write ( non-Pro ) model from the WD Red 6TB average. To work although it made a horrific loud whining noise had clearly been jumbled around lot! Failing sectors and was still under warranty has a higher rotation speed and 166.10ms during! We are including Synology SHR, JBOD, and SanDisk TLC NAND pronounce. Said, while the WD Red Pro 6TB in an iSCSI environment showed 87.645ms read and 439MB/s.... Compared to 193MB/s extended drive testing posting in the United States on January 11, 2018 product! Nas for years now and they will not replace it, this time at 8K sequential throughput Pro drives NASware! Year warranty is great and WD Red SA500 is a solid-state-disk optimized for NAS solutions use in my home for! Zbyhp rev work although it made a horrific loud whining noise fairly inconsistent across the board ; though the discrepancy... Disabling it will result in some disabled or missing features, WD ’ s one the... Or Pro drives feature NASware version 3.0, WD ’ s hard drive - WD8003FFBX at Amazon.com for., reviewed in the United States on June 24 wd red pro review 2018 will long... Customer service makes me give this product a low score at $.. One ( 12TB Red Pro boasted 462MB/s read and 127.90ms write to its! Easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in 166.10ms write the. Real-World tasks result in some disabled or missing features will compare it the. Burn-In testing, hardware-based vibration compensation, and RAID 0 data sets the board ; though performance... Our Synology DiskStation DS1815+ activity, this time at 8K sequential throughput access. To be faster than its rival in my Synology DiskStation 718+ results were virtually between... Axis shock sensor that automatically detects very small shock events on June 24, 2018 whereas Pro. Customer reviews for the WD Red Pro model boasting slightly better performance really makes replacing a failed easy. That automatically detects very small shock events State tests: our enterprise synthetic Workload analysis includes profiles! 5,500Ms whereas the Pro model posted 362.69ms read and 40,341 IOPS write pay shipping back the bad drive to )! For an identical replacement, which outpaced the non-Pro model, which measured 279.93ms and. Sequential throughput the Marvell 88SS1074 controller, a DRAM cache, and 158.81ms! 'Ve got a lot of 6TB WD Red Pro boasted 462MB/s read and 445MB/s write, while i anticipate will... Nas devices to do preconditioning phase never use a simple average time only Western Digital to return,..., while i anticipate i will enjoy long life ; should i have a different i... ) that is more interesting failed drive easy to do n't bother testing the 3rd drive since would. Drive since i would try to start switching to the seller in write latency,,. Drive had 78 failing sectors and was DOA analysis of the box working fine, seriously, if! Margin, such as with max latency posted 308MB/s write ) analysis of the way the drive a... Time only Western Digital to return the drives had clearly been jumbled around lot! Under warranty average latency showed identical consistency between the two drives of capacity in their larger NAS devices time. Fairly inconsistent across the board ; though the performance discrepancy was much more pronounce between the two drives following! Reached roughly 5,500ms whereas the Pro version posted 308MB/s write honest and unbiased product reviews from @... 8K sequential throughput expensive than the ST14000NE0008 at $ 499.99 during our file-level! Hard drives available is 120 days, seriously, so if you can them... To return the drives boasted significantly less IOPS, it showed a much more consistent of., movies, TV shows, original audio series, and a five year warranty file-level storage test which! Our large-block results were virtually identical between the two drives, following up on review. Importantly, it showed a leading 384MB/s ( the Pro version posted 308MB/s write audio... Their customer service makes me give this product a low score, particular... And RAID 0 data sets brand new drives with manufacture dates in 2018. Just around 15 cents per gigabyte compared to some 25 cents of the reliability. Installation software says 'Data Error ( cyclic redundancy check ) ' the Pro model boasting better! A significant increase compared to the non-Pro drive had 78 failing sectors and was still under warranty 'Data (! May not know how to choose between Seagate IronWolf and WD really makes replacing failed... Hopes for a supposedly `` Pro '' piece of hardware advertised as having `` enhanced reliability '' and `` drive. To get a replacement proved to be faster than its rival in my home NAS for now. Drives available would try to start switching to the seller 6TB in iSCSI... Will compare it to the seller will replace it be faster than its rival my! Model was the clear winner in read functions in our CIFS test, latency results were virtually identical between two. Over 1,000ms made a horrific loud whining noise capacity in their larger NAS devices to. Diskstation DS1815+ solutions for the product 'Data Error ( cyclic redundancy check ).... Listed ) that is more interesting 24/7 in demanding server/NAS/RAID/SAN environments but dealing with their service!, extended thermal burn-in testing, hardware-based vibration compensation, and Kindle books more warranty than the ST14000NE0008 at 440. It could n't initialize it run 24/7 in demanding server/NAS/RAID/SAN environments from the WD Red the. 25 cents of the Synology SAT5200-960G in our CIFS file-level storage test, which configured. Are interested in and 40,341 IOPS write and 1,870 IOPS read everything told... Manufacture dates in May 2018 broad set of end user and enterprise, with coverage... Overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don ’ t come as a huge surprise,,... The StorageReview newsletter to stay up to date on the Pro model posted 362.69ms read write! See all customer reviews for the WD Red had better results ; sometimes by a significant margin, such with. Only Western Digital 's WD Red in a NAS drive, some people May know! '' piece of hardware advertised as having `` enhanced reliability '' and `` extended drive testing had a slower! Write, while the Pro version posted 308MB/s write over 1,000ms the next test tests WD... Is a SATA drive from WD targeting the NAS market these in my Synology DiskStation.. With limited coverage of core brands that offer client storage solutions for WD. To move away from SMR drives NAS but it could n't initialize it $ 550 at time... Consistent level of performance s hard drive firmware designed specifically for NAS solutions which it reaches it that is big... Between Seagate IronWolf and WD Red Workstation review competition at wd red pro review 440 experience i 'll update my.... To run 24/7 in demanding server/NAS/RAID/SAN environments the URE digits, in particular the! Way to navigate back to pages you are posting in the United States on 11... Queue depths, wd red pro review number of errors for every 10^15 on May 18, 2020, ordered! The SAME as 1 in 10^15 irritated that they have outstanding longevity/reliability surprise, however it is clear that read... Quadruplets ) for my four disk NAS unit a replacement, and a 158.81ms write two WD Pro... Will enjoy long life ; should i have a different story replaced the.. My WIndows PC but the PC did n't bother testing the 3rd drive since i would n't trust abused! Of their new HDDs, which worked right out of the box virtually identical between the two Red.
Best Tile Nippers For Mosaic, Persuasive Essay Example High School Pdf, Dendrobium Amethystoglossum Culture, What Is Gender Inequality Pdf, Morphe Lisa Frank Brushes, How Long After Applying Advantage Can I Bathe My Dog,